A Browser Use Cloud alternative for isolated agent sessions.
Legba replaces one narrower Browser Use Cloud job. Agents receive routing and isolated browser sessions. It does not replace the complete platform.
Browser Use Cloud combines agents and raw browsers. It also provides profiles, proxies, recordings, and live views. Those features matter for broader automation programs.
Choose Browser Use Cloud for platform depth. Evaluate Legba for task-scoped routing and isolation. Verify every required interface before switching.
The short version
Map the job before replacing the platform.
Start with the replacement boundary.
The search sounds broader than the decision. Browser Use names both cloud and open-source products. Browser Use Cloud is the hosted platform. The open-source framework is a separate choice.
Legba overlaps with one cloud outcome. An agent gets routing and browser isolation. The browser runs away from its machine. Each session stays scoped to its task.
That overlap does not prove platform parity. Browser Use Cloud exposes broader operational controls. It supports agent tasks and raw browser sessions. It also manages state and observation.
Begin with today's actual dependency. List interfaces, state, geography, and observation. Then mark every requirement as mandatory. Optional features should not control the decision.
Compare the published product shape.
A feature count rewards the broader platform. That approach still misses the buyer's job. This table maps capabilities to operating consequences. Unknown Legba features remain explicitly unknown.
Browser Use Cloud owns more platform surface. Legba offers a deliberately narrower public entry. Neither shape is universally better. The required workflow decides the fit.
| Factor | Legba | Browser Use Cloud | Decision impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Route and isolate agent browser sessions. | Run hosted agents and raw browsers. | Choose the narrower required job. |
| Agent entry | Use a ready agent skill. | Create hosted tasks through cloud interfaces. | Compare task inputs and returned outputs. |
| Raw browser access | No public protocol parity exists. | Create sessions and connect through CDP. | Existing CDP code favors Browser Use Cloud. |
| Saved state | No public profile parity exists. | Profiles preserve authenticated browser state. | Recurring authenticated work favors documented profiles. |
| Observation | No public recording parity exists. | Live views and recordings support review. | Operational review favors Browser Use Cloud. |
| Routing geography | Routing is part of the skill. | Managed proxy locations cover 195-plus countries. | Verify every required location before migration. |
| Self-hosting | No public skill option exists. | The open-source framework supports self-managed use. | Neither hosted offer becomes self-hosted automatically. |
Official product facts, verified August 28, 2026.
SourcesLegbaBrowser UseBrowser UseBrowser UseBrowser UseBrowser Use
Use the four-part replacement map.
Most failed migrations skip dependency mapping. The endpoint looks like the whole product. State and operations appear later. Those hidden dependencies create expensive surprises.
This map separates four replacement layers. Each layer needs its own evidence. One matching layer proves only that layer. It never proves complete compatibility.
| Factor | Question | Published answer | Safe action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Task layer | Does the agent need browser execution? | Both products overlap at this level. | Compare required task outcomes first. |
| Interface layer | Does existing code require Cloud interfaces? | Legba publishes no drop-in compatibility. | Treat switching as an integration project. |
| State layer | Do tasks reuse authenticated profiles? | Browser Use Cloud documents profile reuse. | Keep profiles unless alternatives prove parity. |
| Operations layer | Do teams need views and recordings? | Browser Use Cloud documents both capabilities. | Preserve current review and support workflows. |
| Infrastructure layer | Must the runtime remain self-managed? | Browser Use open source supports that model. | Compare the framework instead of Cloud. |
A practical boundary for migration planning.
Where Browser Use Cloud is stronger.
Browser Use Cloud provides broader agent infrastructure. Teams can create hosted agent tasks. They can also create raw browser sessions. That range reduces separate vendor decisions.
Profiles strengthen recurring authenticated workflows. Live views expose active browser behavior. Recordings support later diagnosis and review. Those tools strengthen operational review.
Managed proxy routing adds geographic choice. Official documentation lists 195-plus supported countries. The default configuration uses United States routing. Buyers can select other supported countries.
These capabilities create real switching costs. Existing workflows may depend on several layers. Replacing only browser execution remains incomplete. The surrounding operations still need answers.
- Keep it for raw CDP connections.
- Keep it for reusable authenticated profiles.
- Keep it for live operational review.
- Keep it for session recordings.
- Keep it for documented global routing.
- Keep it for hosted agent tasks.
Where Legba fits better.
Some teams do not need another platform. Their agent needs one browser boundary. Routing must remain part of that boundary. The session should stay task-scoped.
Legba packages that narrower job directly. The public entry point is a ready skill. It runs sessions on Legba's infrastructure. The agent's machine stays outside execution.
That simplicity reduces initial decision load. It does not erase integration work. Teams still must validate task inputs. They must also validate expected outputs.
Legba fits focused agent browsing decisions. It does not replace Browser Use broadly. Public documentation claims no raw API parity. It also claims no profile parity.
- Evaluate it for task-scoped isolation.
- Evaluate it for agent-directed routing.
- Evaluate it for a ready skill.
- Reject assumed Cloud API compatibility.
- Reject assumed profile compatibility.
- Reject assumed self-hosting support.
SourcesLegba
Read current pricing carefully.
Browser Use Cloud combines subscriptions and usage. That structure changes the effective monthly cost. Concurrency also changes across plans. Proxy use adds another variable.
The live pricing page matters most. Older cached figures may remain searchable. We use the live page here. Recheck it before approving spend.
Legba publishes no agent-skill price. That unknown prevents a complete cost comparison. Request current commercial terms before deciding. Compare the same measured workload.
| Factor | Published price | Concurrency | Planning note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | The subscription costs $0 monthly. | The plan starts with 3 sessions. | Use it for a bounded evaluation. |
| Dev | The subscription costs $29 monthly. | The plan includes 25 concurrent sessions. | Add browser and proxy usage. |
| Business | The subscription costs $299 monthly. | The plan includes 200 concurrent sessions. | Model real peak demand first. |
| Scaleup | The subscription costs $999 monthly. | The plan includes 500 concurrent sessions. | Proxy usage receives lower pricing. |
| Browser usage | Usage costs $0.02 per browser hour. | Concurrency still follows the selected plan. | Measure active browser hours separately. |
| Managed proxy usage | Most plans cost $5 per gigabyte. | Scaleup costs $4 per gigabyte. | Measure transferred traffic separately. |
Live Browser Use pricing, verified August 28, 2026.
SourcesBrowser Use
Run a narrow evaluation first.
A small evaluation lowers switching risk. Choose one representative browser task. Include its normal state requirements. Include its normal review requirements.
Do not compare polished demonstrations. Compare the same completion definition. Record retries and operator interventions. Record transferred data and browser time.
The final review needs explicit owners. Engineering owns interface compatibility. Operations owns support visibility. Finance owns the normalized workload model.
- 01
Inventory the current dependency.
List every interface and profile. Include views, recordings, routing, and concurrency.
- 02
Select one complete workflow.
Use a normal production-shaped task. Keep its real completion criteria.
- 03
Test each required boundary.
Verify inputs, outputs, state, and review. Mark every unknown openly.
- 04
Normalize the operating cost.
Combine subscription and usage costs. Include engineering and support time.
- 05
Decide from mandatory requirements.
Keep proven strengths when they matter. Switch only with complete evidence.
Choose the job, then choose.
Browser Use Cloud wins broader requirements. Its documented surface covers agents and browsers. Profiles support recurring authenticated work. Views and recordings support operations.
Legba wins a narrower evaluation. The agent needs routing and isolation. The browser belongs outside the agent's machine. Each session belongs to one task.
Neither verdict requires exaggerated promises. Keep Browser Use Cloud when breadth matters. Evaluate Legba when focus matters. Start with the agent-skill overview.
Then inspect current Legba documentation. Confirm every interface before procurement. Unknowns should remain visible. A clean decision survives those unknowns.
FAQs.
References
- 01Legba agent skillLegba
- 02Browser Use pricingBrowser Use
- 03Cloud quickstartBrowser Use
- 04Authentication guideBrowser Use
- 05Browser proxiesBrowser Use
- 06Create browser sessionBrowser Use
- 07Browser Use open-source frameworkBrowser Use