Airtop alternatives for agent browser workflows.

Airtop is a managed browser platform. It creates cloud browser sessions through APIs. Teams can automate with natural-language actions. They can also use familiar frameworks.

Legba presents a narrower public surface. Its agent skill combines routing and isolation. The agent's stack owns permissions and logs. The cited homepage establishes no Airtop API compatibility.

These products overlap at one outcome. Both can support agent-directed browsing. Their operating models remain materially different. That difference controls migration effort.

Start with one complete workflow. Include authentication and human intervention. Include failure review and recurring state. Then identify each required Airtop dependency.

Airtop supports two broad automation paths. Natural-language APIs interpret higher-level instructions. Framework connections expose lower-level browser control. Each path moves work between vendor and customer.

A natural-language layer can shorten orchestration code. It also introduces model behavior and credit usage. Raw frameworks preserve existing control patterns. They also preserve more engineering ownership.

Natural-language automation changes the evaluation target. Endpoint availability proves very little. Teams must inspect task completion criteria. They must also inspect recovery behavior.

Airtop reports usage metadata for managed actions. Cost thresholds do not create hard limits. Time thresholds govern action execution separately. Buyers should test both boundaries.

Framework automation creates another contract. Selectors and waits remain customer-owned. Browser lifecycle moves into Airtop sessions. CDP connection details become a dependency.

Legba's public skill abstracts another layer. It should not inherit Airtop capabilities silently. Compare required inputs and outputs directly. Reject any assumed natural-language parity.

Airtop sessions contain browser windows. A session receives one browser identifier. Profiles preserve cookies and local storage. Saved profiles support recurring authenticated work.

Airtop saves profile state during termination. Abrupt workflow endings can affect persistence. Teams should make termination behavior explicit. They should also test state deletion.

Live View lets a person authenticate interactively. The view can appear within an iframe. Human access becomes part of application design. Authorization around that view still matters.

The cited Legba homepage documents no profile model. It also documents no profile migration tool. Those gaps do not prove impossibility. They require direct verification before switching.

Airtop provides live interactive access. Operators can inspect active sessions. They can also complete sensitive steps. That supports explicit human review points.

Session recording is opt-in. Airtop creates separate MP4 files per window. Published cleanup occurs after seven days. Review workflows must fit that window.

Recording and profile retention serve different jobs. Recordings support later visual review. Profiles support recurring browser state. Neither replaces structured business audit events.

The cited homepage establishes no recording parity. Its agent stack retains logging ownership. Teams must define required evidence themselves. Preserve current review controls during migration.

Airtop publishes four standard monthly plans. Free includes three simultaneous sessions. Starter costs twenty-nine dollars monthly. Professional costs one hundred eighty-nine dollars.

Enterprise costs five hundred fifty-eight dollars. Published concurrency reaches one hundred there. Annual billing provides a ten percent discount. Custom plans remain separately quoted.

Credits cover several usage categories. These include model usage and browser compute. Proxy bandwidth can also consume credits. Session time bills in thirty-second increments.

Plan prices alone cannot predict costs. A representative task needs measured credit usage. Repeated authentication may change that usage. Failed attempts and recordings also matter.

Airtop supports integrated and customer proxies. Integrated sessions default to United States routing. The service attempts a stable address briefly. Longer stability remains best effort.

Published restrictions cover several website categories. Some financial sites face integrated proxy restrictions. Certain ticketing and professional networks also appear. Customer proxies can change those constraints.

These limitations may decide the evaluation. A proof should use required destinations. It should include authentication and downloads. Synthetic examples can hide routing problems.

Legba includes routing within its skill. The cited homepage documents no equivalent geography. It also shows no proxy matrix. Treat those requirements as unknown.

Keep Airtop for broad managed automation. Its natural-language APIs reduce some orchestration. Its framework access preserves code-level control. Profiles support recurring authenticated sessions.

Airtop documents two review surfaces. Live View enables real-time intervention. Recordings enable short-window visual review. Published plans support explicit capacity selection.

Evaluate Legba for a narrower outcome. The skill combines agent routing and isolation. That simpler boundary can suit focused tasks. These cited scopes establish no broad replacement.

Document every unresolved requirement. Price unknowns should remain visible. Profile parity should remain unclaimed. A complete workflow test should decide.